Boost logo

Boost :

From: Edward Diener (eddielee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-27 17:29:48

Mickey Moore wrote:
> I appreciate everyone's comments (and I'll respond to a number
> below), but
> it seems interest in this is not widespread enough to justify trying
> to formally include it. I'll probably clean it up a bit and post it
> on my own web-site at some point in case someone somewhere might find
> it useful.
> It was a good exercise in humility to note that, judging from the
> message frequency, people are at least a hundred times more
> interested in the new logo for the Boost web-site. :)

No, it probably only means that people are more opinionated when it comes to
artistic design than they are knowledgable about polar complex numbers <g>.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at