From: Daniel Krügler (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 09:28:05
Beman Dawes schrieb:
> At 02:39 AM 11/22/2004, Daniel Krügler wrote:
> >Hi booster,
> >its quite a long time ago since I could follow the threads here more
> >thoroughly :-( , so the following information might not be new one.
> >During tests of the current Win32 implementation of
> >boost::filesystem::equivalent I observed that the function unexpectingly
> >fails (my test environment was Win XP SP 1 with MSVC7.1) if it compares
> >a "soft link" created via the DOS command "subst" (or its API analogon
> >::DefineDosDeviceA/W) with the corresponding mapped path object (Lets
> >say I map M: to the existing directory C:\temp).
> >If the VSN' and further data have returned a positive result, but the
> >check of both st_dev values fails, one should try to check whether the
> >underlying devices are actually the same, e.g. using the
> >::QueryDosDeviceA/W API function.
> I couldn't see an easy way to determine the drive needed for calling
> As an alternative, I removed the st_dev test and added a last_write_time
> test. Documentation also updated. See current CVS. To make it easier to
> experiment, I also added in the test directory a program equivalent.cpp.
> This seems to solve the problem.
> Please give it a try, and let me know if you are still having any problems.
Sorry for the late response Beman!
Although I think that the proposed test could be done (I will send you
some code in 1/2 days), I will also test your new implementation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk