From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 17:23:12
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 10:40 AM 11/29/2004, Daniel Frey wrote:
> >David Abrahams wrote:
> > > [snip]
> >Inspired by that, how about simply writing
> > std::Boost
> I don't like tying Boost too closely to the standardization effort.
> While a lot of Boost libraries are candidates for standardization, that
> isn't the whole story of Boost. I'd rather see the tie to "C++".
I'd say that Boost libraries aim for "standardization quality", not
exactly for standardization. C++ is IMHO too vague, YMMV.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk