From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 17:39:06
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" wrote:
> John, now that you're at is_abstract, I wonder whether you could
> consider adding some workaround in is_abstract.hpp making
> boost::is_abstract return unconditionally false for those compilers
> known not to work for it.
> You can read about the origin of this request at:
Wouldn't it be better to have macro like
BOOST_NO_XYZ defined for failing compilers instead?
(I once suggested BOOST_NO_SUPPORT_FOR_DR337
but it was seen less then descriptive.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk