Date: 2004-12-17 23:43:27
I wrote this (attached file) recently for some my projects which is uses boost
(currently only headers and no binary code)... It can be start point to
develop autoconf support for boost (which is really needed).
Any opinions about how to improve this m4 are welcome ;)
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 16:38, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> First, I would say, there is a need for a better autoconf for boost. There
> has been some interest in scons, and scons also includes some capability
> here that might be useful.
> I don't think pkg-config is the right tool. All it is for is to record the
> settings that were used to build packages - it doesn't figure them out. I
> don't see how that would help boost.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk