Re: [boost] [config][gcc 3.4.2] Request for test about functiontemplate ordering

From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-18 16:51:51

----- Mensaje original -----
De: Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]>
Fecha: Sábado, Diciembre 18, 2004 10:10 pm
Asunto: Re: [boost] [config][gcc 3.4.2] Request for test	about 
functiontemplate ordering

> JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
> > Hi, I've got the hunch that GCC 3.4.2 (specifically,
> > the mingw version) might have some problems with
> > function template ordering. Could somebody with
> > access to that compiler please run the code below
> > and report the results? Many thanks in advance.
> 
> "bar-specific" for gcc 3.4.0, gcc 3.4.2, gcc 3.4.3,
> gcc 3.3.5, gcc 3.2.3, gcc 3.1 on Linux.
> 

Hi Martin. Well, seems my snippet does not capture
the problem, but defiintely there's some difference
wrt function template ordering handling between
GCC 3.3.x and GCC 3.3.4: the issue is shown
here:

http://tinyurl.com/3nkgw (GCC 3.4.3 on your regression
machine)

This is a test for serialization capabilities of
Boost.MultiIndex, and it works for GCC <3.4.x.
In GCC 3.4.4, hoeever, a user-provided overload of
boost::serialization::load_construct_data is not
picked up.

I guess you have the current CVS downloaded at your
machine, since you're publishing regressions.
Could you please do me a favor? If so, please
define BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING and rerun
Boost.MultiIndex test_serialization for GCC 3.4.4.
Boost.Serialization has some machinery to overcome
fto problems.

Thanks!

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo