|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-21 14:01:32
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:35:46PM -0000, John Maddock wrote:
>
>>> According to GCC's bugzilla whether this is wrong is an open Core
>>> issue http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17365
>>>
>>> I'm not sure which DR Gaby is referring to there, possibly 405 ?
>>
>> Aha: you're right this is active issue 218
>> (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/prot/14882fdis/n1729.html#218),
>> so gcc appears to be correct, even though it results in some really
>> unfortunate behaviour.
>>
>> Thanks for clearing that up,
>
> It's also worth mentioning that nothing in the standard requires
> libstdc++ to qualify calls to find() etc.
http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk