From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-23 22:58:52
David Greene wrote:
> I see that a Named Params library has been accepted into Boost. Great!
> Is this named template params or named function params?
> I've actually been working on a named template params implementation
> of my own so I'm particularly curious about what Dave and Daniel have
> done, whether it be for templates or functions.
> Is there an accessible page of documentation somewhere?
> There's been a named_template_params.hpp in the sandbox for a long
> time. What's going on with that? Is there general interest in a
> named template parameters library?
There has already been a released named_template_params.hpp in
IMO named template parameters are unweildy in C++. I prefer "unnamed
template parameters" like those described in
As a matter of fact, I was just looking into how to extend our named
parameters library to handle unnamed function parameters.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk