Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-23 22:58:52

David Greene wrote:
> I see that a Named Params library has been accepted into Boost. Great!
> Is this named template params or named function params?

Function parameters.

> I've actually been working on a named template params implementation
> of my own so I'm particularly curious about what Dave and Daniel have
> done, whether it be for templates or functions.
> Is there an accessible page of documentation somewhere?

> There's been a named_template_params.hpp in the sandbox for a long
> time. What's going on with that? Is there general interest in a
> named template parameters library?

There has already been a released named_template_params.hpp in
boost/detail "forever".

IMO named template parameters are unweildy in C++. I prefer "unnamed
template parameters" like those described in

As a matter of fact, I was just looking into how to extend our named
parameters library to handle unnamed function parameters.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at