From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-03 16:35:41
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| Howard Hinnant wrote:
| > Btw, I kind of like "decayed" for a name.
| It occurred to me that decayed falls into the "transformations between
| category, and so should be in the imperative for consistency with the other
| transformations: decay<T>::type.
yeah, I agree.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk