[boost] Re: Yet another variant-style type, and boost inter-library dependencies

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-05 12:45:38

On 01/04/2005 11:52 AM, christopher diggins wrote:
> I have written a union-style type similar to boost::variant which allows 
[snip]
> single values, and multiple types. This type is called a union-list ( ul 
> ) and is described at http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/union_list.asp
This code has specializations of nested classes, and, at least according
to compile errors in comments to the example code in:

http://boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/vault/class_scope_specialization.cpp

this wouldn't be accepted by gcc.