From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-07 02:42:49
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| At 04:04 PM 1/5/2005, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| >| void to_bytes(byte_string & destination,
| >| wide_string const & source) const;
| >I would prefer these to be free-standing functions.
| >Was there something that prohibited that?
| No. I was just following the pattern set by the proposal. I'm not sure how
| the LWG feels about that; I'll add a mention of the issue so they can
| decide. Would you care to add a short rationale?
| Thanks for the comment,
well, its an algorithm, right? All the algorithms in <algorithm> are
In some sense, we might need both. The class interface could be used under the
to provide the function interface.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk