[boost] Re: [MPL] unlambda primitive

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-07 10:07:33

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David Abrahams writes:
>> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>>
>>> Any particular reason why you decided against implicit scoping along
>>> the lines of
>>> 
>>>     for_each( _1, push_back(_1, outer(_2)) )
>>> 
>>> ?
>>
>> It doesn't generalize all that well, FWIW.  
> 
> Of course it does.
> 
>> What if you have to go out
>> by 2 scopes?
> 
>      outer( outer(_2) )
> 
> or 
>      outer<2>(_2)
> 
> 
> All this is discussed in the conversation I posted earlier -- in which
> you participated ;).

Yeah, it was just hard to read for the aforementioned reason.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com