Re: [boost] Re: BOOST_NO_RTTI?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-08 12:10:29

John Maddock wrote:
>> Okay, so let's have BOOST_NO_RTTI defined when the
>> compiler/environment does not support RTTI, and we can use it to
>> turn off use of RTTI in some Boost components :)
>> 
>> But Peter is right, there are macros here... perhaps BOOST_NO_RTTI
>> and BOOST_NO_DYNAMIC_RTTI, with the former implying the latter.
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me, but do we ever use RTTI in non-dynamic
> situations anyway?

We do. get_deleter<> only needs typeid(T), for instance.