From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-10 18:43:08
Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:54:42 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> If I have to choose, then, I would much rather use the namespace io
>>>> and move the library back to boost/io than use the namespace
>>> You don't _have_ to choose, but then you could do better than the
>>> status quo.
>> Okay, I'll hold off adding iostreams to CVS while I think about it
>> some more.
> Sorry, still catching up on holiday email. Did a decision get made
> on this yet? Because I'd really hate to see the last conclusion:
> 'holding off on adding iostreams'.
What I meant was I'd think about it some more before adding the library... I've
now thought about it, and decided to use directory and namespace iostreams. So I
will added it shortly.
(I don't think there will be many problems porting iostreams, since I've already
tested it on most of the supported platforms)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk