Re: [boost] Re: Singleton

From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-11 17:51:32

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=3EC3AA39.7126DCCC%40web.de
>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=3ECBD751.8DE8AED5%40web.de
>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=4049DF28.BFEDCD0A%40web.de
>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=410280D4.F18B3B87%40web.de
>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=412533CA.82703A04%40web.de
>http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=41C301DF.5B50EDB7%40web.de
>
Thanks for the links.  However, I am not looking to use a threading 
library... instead, I only want to provide a hook for client code to 
use.  What I am mainly looking for is a good interface for a thread 
safety mechanism.  Then I can let client code deal with the details.  Is 
requiring empty lock and unlock methods adequate, or are there other 
safety mechanisms that should be included?

-Jason