Re: [boost] Re: [ublas] uBLAS regressions/unsupported compilers

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-13 03:25:43

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Toon Knapen writes:
> 
>>for test3 of ublas I would like to keep the remark of Stefan for 
>>intel-win32-8_1 and apply remark with 'refid = 30' of Michael Stevens 
>>for the two gcc-2.95's. Should I modify explicit-markup-failure.xml as 
>>below for doing that ?
>>
>>         <test name="test3">
>>             <mark-failure>
>>                 <toolset name="intel-win32-8_1"/>
>>                 <note author="S. Slapeta" refid="3"/>
>>                 <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-linux"/>
>>                 <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3-linux"/>
>>                 <note author="M.Stevens" refid="6"/>
>>             </mark-failure>
>>         </test>
>>
>>
>>Or should I use two <mark-failure> blocks or ...?
> 
> 
> The latter (two blocks).
> 

Thanks. No another related question. For test's 1 to 6 of ublas, the 
name is explicitly specified in the explicit-failures file. However for 
the 2 first tests (concepts and placement_new) no name seems to be 
specified. And there is no <test name="..."> block for those apparantly. 
But how can I have multiple <mark-failure> blocks for the same test than?