
Boost : 
From: Martin (adrianm_at_[hidden])
Date: 20050113 11:48:37
> IMO any kind of automatic rounding and precision should not be part of a
> basic_decimal type at all!
I assume you mean that we don't need a decimal type with a fixed number of
decimals. There is an extension to the propsed standard that allows fixed
number of decimals so there seem to be some who need it.
I know that I need fixed number of decimals in the software I am working with
and that I often both have objects with round_to_nearest and round_toward_zero
in the same application.
If I had a decimal floating point type available I could probably have used
it. It would make some things easier and other things more difficult.
> The behaviour of basic_decimal should stick
> to the decimal proposal of Mike Cowlishaw and he explains very well in
> his FAQ section why it's not a good idea to have normalized decimal
> arithmetic:
Why do you mention "normalized decimal arithmetic"? Isn't that a way store
floating point numbers or do you mean something else.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk