Re: [boost] program_options lib patch

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-13 15:23:24

> From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> 2. What compilers did you test your modification with? I recall that
> std::tolower vs. tolower thing was hard to get working everywhere, so
> I'd rather no touch it unless it's broken somewhere.

This is how I deal with it:

void function_using_tolower()
{
    using namespace std;
    // use unqualified tolower
}

I haven't found a better way to tackle the issue (when using the <cxx> 
headers). In .cpp files, <xx.h> is an option.