|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-17 00:24:20
Beman Dawes writes:
> At 03:04 PM 1/14/2005, troy d. straszheim wrote:
>
> >I gotta say, this is really time-intensive work... I wonder if
> >running regressions "by default" in both debug and release mode
> >might not be good practice... It could be better to try to catch
> >things like this on the way in.
>
> That has been discussed, but some of the people who actually run the
> tests just don't have enough resources to double the test load.
This was not the reason why we didn't test the release configuration
for 1.32 -- it was simply too late in the process when we've tried it
and realized that the codebase needs non-trivial work for the results
to be trusted (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/110127).
>
> Seems like we need a way to partition the testing so that the load
> can be distributed.
We already do: testing a single compiler in one configuration is well
within a reasonable amount of time (~2 hours, I think). We simply need
to call for volunteers.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk