From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-24 06:39:27
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:55:03 -0000, John Maddock wrote
> >> My prediction is that it will be four to six years before all the
> >> compilers boost users care about ship with the full tr1 in the box.
> > Wow, I sure hope you're wrong. That's an awful long time considering that
> > they have open implementations to use as a starting point.
> Maybe, the impression I'm getting is that commercial TR1
> implementations will be available soon, but that they won't ship
> with compilers until they become part of the official standard.
Ok, I thought they were already 'official', but not required. So when does
it become 'official'?
> I guess time will tell.
> Well they have two choices:
> 1) Do nothing, and carry on using the Boost versions.
> 2) Use the TR1 forwarding headers, and switch to the std::tr1 versions.
> Probably (1) is a safer bet until we see what kind of quality we get
> from early TR1 implementations.
But there is also this option -- is there not?
3) Use the config macros to pick the same tr1 implementation as the user
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk