Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-29 09:28:45


Reading the mpl documentation it states that boost::mpl::plus is expected to
be specialised for non Integral Constants.

Therefore should the following work ?:

typedef boost::mpl::plus<int,int>::type int_plus_int_type; // eg int
presumably

OTOH it could be said that:

 mpl::plus<int_<1>, int_<1> >::type

and

mpl::plus<int,int>::type

are conceptually different and that therefore mpl::plus<int,int> should
be(remain) invalid.

Any thoughts?

regards
Andy Little


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk