[boost] Re: Re: Re: boost v 1.33 ?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-01 12:20:41

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:038701c5087b$f39253e0$54540252_at_fuji...
> > It this moment CVS HEAD should compile without errors on most compilers.
>
> Um, take a look at
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/test.html
> It doesn't look all that good, sorry.

Another thing about this page is:

1. cw 9_3 failures are unaccessible
2. intel- 8.1 failures caused by misconfiguration
3. gcc- 3.4.3- linux caused by error like:
/usr/local/gcc-3.4.3/bin/g++: cannot execute binary file
4. Looks like many test files did not get updated cuase they point to
deleted files

Gennadiy