From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-02 00:31:14
Matthew Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:37:18 -0700, "Jonathan Turkanis"
> <technews_at_[hidden]> said:
>> I'm sympathetic to this point of view. The reason it doesn't seem so
>> bad to me
>> is that only a relatively small part of coding with BIL is actually
>> interfaces; the code which uses the interfaces is just ordinary C++.
> Yeah, but in order to write any ordinary C++ using an interface, you
> must first (mentally) parse the interface.
> Yes, you won't write much
> IDL, but it will be read many times...
You can always write the pseudocode together with the interface:
void print(ostream&, int) const;
BOOST_IDL_CONST_FN2(print, void, ostream&, int)
Of course, you run the risk that they will get out of sync.
> BTW, cool library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk