From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-03 14:12:44
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" writes:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> "Jonathan Turkanis" writes:
>>>> If I could just get rid of that damned arity everything would be
>>> (int, print, (ostream&)(int))
>> This might be the best one yet. The same basic idea as your earlier
>> suggestion, but without two of the annoying sets of parentheses. If
>> you can help me figure out where to stick 'const' I'll be ready to
>> roll. :-)
> You mean member function constness?
Yeah, that's what I meant. I'm willing to overlook volatile.
> Sorry, I don't know. Maybe Paul
> M. has some ideas
Okay, I'll email him.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk