[boost] Re: Re: Two alined_storage classes in the CVS

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-03 20:30:40

whoops, I had assumed that TR1 implementations would be in a separate
namespace than boost.  I was extrapolating from std:: whereby
implementations of the standard library are in namespace std.  I guess, I'll
have to get a little more information about this.

Robert Ramey

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]>
> Fecha: Jueves, Febrero 3, 2005 9:51 pm
> Asunto: [boost] Re: Two alined_storage classes in the CVS
>
>> Since these are in different namespaces, can this not be just
>> ignored?  Is
>> it worth spending any time on?
>>
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'm afraid both classes live directly in namespace boost.
>
> Joaquín M López Muñoz
> Telefónica, Investigación y Desarollo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost