Re: [boost] Profiling Library suggestion

From: Sérgio Vale e Pace (svpace.forum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-04 13:50:47

if there is interest in it I would like to boostify it, I´m frequently
use something like this and I find it very useful.

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:07:59 -0500, christopher diggins
<cdiggins_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I was searching around boost for mention of a profiling library. A fellow by
> the name of Carl Daniels posted something about an invasive profiling
> library. I was wondering in anyone knows what happened to that project?
> Profiling seems lacking at Boost, is anyone else interested in such a thing?
> 
> Would a trivial policy driven RAII type be sufficient to garner interest as
> a mini-library?
> 
> e.g.
> 
>   struct ProfilerDefaultPolicy {
>     OnElapsed(int msec) {
>       cout << "time elapsed (msec): " << msec << endl;
>     }
>   };
> 
>   template<typename Policy_T = ProfilerDefaultPolicy>
>   class Profiler {
>     public:
>       Profiler() { mnStart = GetTickCount(); };
>       ~Profiler() { Policy_T::OnElapsed(GetMSecElapsed()); };
>       int GetMSecElapsed() { return GetTickCount() - mnStart; };
>       int GetTickCount() { return int(double(clock()) * 1000 /
> CLOCKS_PER_SEC); };
>     private:
>       int mnStart;
>   };
> 
> usage:
> 
>   void MyRoutine() {
>     Profiler<> p;
>     // do stuff
>   }
> 
> Pretty trivial (and probably not boost-worthy), but I find it very useful.
> Does anyone want to take this and run with it (i.e. boostify it)?
> 
> Christopher Diggins
> Object Oriented Template Library (OOTL)
> http://www.ootl.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>