From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-05 07:47:03
> In my opinion, the older version needs to be removed entirely and the
> libraries should be updated to use the TR1 version of aligned_storage.
I wondered about that as well, in fact I started testing a possible fix,
only to realise half way through that it's more or less trivial to patch the
"old" aligned_storage to make it conform to the TR (just needs a ::type
typedef member), I'm testing that now, but expect to see the new version
disappear from cvs shortly.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk