Re: [boost] Two alined_storage classes in the CVS

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-05 07:47:03

> In my opinion, the older version needs to be removed entirely and the 
> libraries should be updated to use the TR1 version of aligned_storage.

I wondered about that as well, in fact I started testing a possible fix, 
only to realise half way through that it's more or less trivial to patch the 
"old" aligned_storage to make it conform to the TR (just needs a ::type 
typedef member), I'm testing that now, but expect to see the new version 
disappear from cvs shortly.

John.