[boost] Re: [boost.tr1?] request for a hash<> implementation

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-06 13:12:32

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
> What I'm interested in in the short term is the hash<> functor
> alone. Of course unordered containers are much more interesting,
> but this will have to undergo the usual review process, I guess.
> Do you think we can put your hash<> implementation under
> boost/functional/hash.hpp and have some short docs for it?

I've just uploaded a new version. I've rewritten the hash functions 
based on Peter's design. I'll write some documentation and some more 
tests soon.

Daniel