[boost] subgraph test and BOOST_CHECK

From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-08 07:32:52

Hi all,

there are a few cases where I didn't touch the code when replacing 
BOOST_TEST. One of them is the subgraph test, as there occurs a slightly 
different problem:

It seems to me that this code worked so far:

     // ...cpp file
     #include <boost/test/minimal.hpp>

     // ...some header file
     #include <boost/test/test_tools.hpp>

     BOOST_TEST(...);

For the code above, the initial declarations of test/minimal.hpp have 
been used.
When you do the same now (after replacing BOOST_TEST), the compiler 
complains about macro redefinition _and_ you get unresolved externals at 
linking time.

C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\test_tools.hpp(81) : warning C4005: 
'BOOST_CHECK' : macro redefinition
         C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\minimal.hpp(21) : see previous 
definition of 'BOOST_CHECK'
C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\test_tools.hpp(82) : warning C4005: 
'BOOST_REQUIRE' : macro redefinition
         C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\minimal.hpp(26) : see previous 
definition of 'BOOST_REQUIRE'
C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\test_tools.hpp(92) : warning C4005: 
'BOOST_ERROR' : macro redefinition
         C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\minimal.hpp(29) : see previous 
definition of 'BOOST_ERROR'
C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\test_tools.hpp(93) : warning C4005: 
'BOOST_FAIL' : macro redefinition
         C:\views_cvs\boost\boost\test\minimal.hpp(31) : see previous 
definition of 'BOOST_FAIL'

Is it intended that these macros are defined differently for the minimal 
testing facility? If yes, another testing strategy has to be chosen for 
this case.
Nevertheless, I've replaced the occurances of BOOST_TEST now.

Stefan