|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Michiel Salters: "RE: [boost] Wave C++ Review Begins Today - February 7, 2005"
- Previous message: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] Wave C++ Review Begins Today - February 7, 2005"
- In reply to: Martin Wille: "[boost] Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
- Next in thread: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
- Reply: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
Martin Wille wrote:
>
> Fusion still uses BOOST_TEST (which doesn't exist anymore).
>
I didn't replace them as I did with the others because there's nothing
in the regression tests about fusion.
In program_options/winmain.cpp, there is another problem with
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_COLLECTIONS: http://tinyurl.com/58q8u
There are a few other problems that are responsible for the major part
of failing test cases:
1)
a missing function IsDebuggerPresent()
--> http://tinyurl.com/4va7p
2)
error: namespace "boost" has no member "exit_success"
--> http://tinyurl.com/44dj5
What is the migration strategy for these?
Stefan
- Next message: Michiel Salters: "RE: [boost] Wave C++ Review Begins Today - February 7, 2005"
- Previous message: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] Wave C++ Review Begins Today - February 7, 2005"
- In reply to: Martin Wille: "[boost] Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
- Next in thread: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
- Reply: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: Incorrect usage of test macros in octionion, quaternion, special_functions, regex, fusion."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk