From: Dan Nuffer (dan-boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-10 00:46:54
Tom Brinkman wrote:
> * What is your evaluation of the design?
I think it's good.
> * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Very good. Hartmut's work is high quality.
> * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
I haven't read it in detail, but after skimming it, it seems complete
> * What is your evaluation of the potential
> usefulness of the library?
While most developers may not find it useful, it could be indispensable
for others, and will hopefully serve as a building block for more
powerful c++ tools.
> * Did you try to use the library? With what
> * How much effort did you put into your
> A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
I have been following the development of Wave ever since Hartmut started
it. I paid more attention when he first started, but have been keeping
an eye on it in the past few years.
> * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
To an extent. I know Spirit fairly well, and I originally wrote the c++
lexers Wave uses. Obviously Hartmut has improved them, and Wave
actually drove some of the features of SLex.
> And finally, every review should answer this question:
> * Do you think the library should be accepted as a
> Boost library?
-- Dan Nuffer
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk