Boost logo

Boost :

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-14 15:35:10

On 02/14/2005 09:21 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:

>> I think the fusion tuples are already TR1-compatible (?) and we are
>> supposed to transition over to them immediately (?) anyway. Joel?
> Yes. Fusion has been here with us for almost 2 years now and
> the code is very mature. I've already used it in a couple of projects
> and it is holding up pretty well. If possible, I'd like to
> transition to it as soon as possible. I tried to contact Jaakko

Could you provide some benchmarks justifying use of fusion tuple
vs. indexed_types/composite_product.hpp. I know David provided some
reasons in:

however, no benchmarks were provided and no "detailed" justifcation
explaining why it would be better than composite_product. Indeed, it
would be impossible at that time since apparently the
composite_product code hadn't been looked at, according to this quote:

   I guess you're assuming I've looked at your code again ;-)


I'd be happy to help with coding and running benchmarks.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at