Re: [boost] Re: bald singleton pointers

From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-14 17:54:06

Rob Stewart wrote:

>That's definitely better.  You don't want to make it pretty when
>someone adds this feature.  However, given that the need for this
>behavior might be just common enough to make this addition to
>every Singleton type too much pain, how about another class
>template:
>
>template <typename T>
>class unsafe_singleton : public singleton<T>
>{
>public:
>   //! WARNING: Do not delete the returned pointer!
>   T * unsafe_get()
>   {
>      return this;
>   }
>};
>
That's manageable, I can add that.

-Jason