|
Boost : |
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-15 10:30:21
On 02/15/2005 08:08 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
[snip]
>> Yes, it is a non-member function. No, it does not mutate s.
>> It does return another set. It is purely functional (no side-
>> effects).
Then it's different from tuple<T1,...,Tn> since any mutating
operation Ti::op on an instance of Ti can be performed on the
corresponding member variable in an instance of tuple<T1,...,Tn>?
See boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/vault/cppljevans/field_visitor_tests
/field_sets.hpp for an example of what I had thought you were
talking about here:
> fusion::vector, fusion::list, fusion::set and fusion::map
> all have data. These are different incarnations of the
> tuple with different characteristics.
when you said fusion::set had data. Having data implies, at least
to me, that the data can be modified.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk