From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-15 10:21:33
"Alexander Nasonov" <alnsn_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> So it's just a way of classifying states with common properties?
>> That's a clever approach to dealing with substates. I'm not sure it
>> works for every case, but then, the details of how substates are
>> supposed to work have always eluded me.
> I'm not quite sure my approach works well with substates.
>> I still don't see how you can keep associated data stored in the
>> Active base sub-object alive across all the other active states, at
>> least not without copying it.
> Transition is copying. It is implied by transition pattern:
> NewState operator()(id, State, Event) const;
> ^^^^^^^^ new state is returned by value
That's a bit unattractive performance-wise.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk