Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-15 23:10:05

"Joe Gottman" <jgottman_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I disagree. This may ensure the basic exception-safety guarantee, but
> most code that uses optional<T> will use T::operator=() at some point or
> other. So if T::operator=() is not exception-safe

Whoa, here we go again! You seem to be assuming

  basic exception-safety guarantee == "not exception-safe."

That's just not true for any reasonable definition of

Or am I misunderstanding you?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at