From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-16 15:56:34
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> 1.4. Usual implementations use one pointer per bucket, whereas
> Boost.MultiIndex has two pointers per bucket. This addresses potential
> performance problems of insert() and erase() under low load conditions,
> as discussed in
> issue 6.14. Is this convenient?
I think this is good. Boost.MultiIndex and the standard hash containers
are intended for quite different uses and this reflects it. MultiIndex
is a more powerful and flexible container, but is a little heavier.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk