[boost] Re: [bug]: optional<T> fails on self-assignment

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-17 13:08:16

"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Or to put it another way, if a class is so broken as to support a reasonable 
> copy-constructor (which is a current requirement), but not assignment, then 
> I'm probably doing him/her a favor by breaking it :-)

?? Any immutable or const type should fit that description.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com