[boost] Re: Re: [indirect container] RFCon naming of libraryandclasses

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-17 16:42:37

"Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:20050217204616.GW3808_at_lenin.felcer.sk...
| On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:10:45PM +0100, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:

| > To sum it up, I vote for "pointer container", "clone container"
| > being my close-second choice.
| >
|
| As a short remark, I second this opinion with the strong preference
| over "pointer container".
|
| The library combines serveral aspects, but the "pointer" is actualy
| the only unifying entity in all of them.

Allriiighty then, we have a winner :-)

Thanks for your input.

-Thorsten