From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-17 16:42:37
"Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:10:45PM +0100, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
| > To sum it up, I vote for "pointer container", "clone container"
| > being my close-second choice.
| As a short remark, I second this opinion with the strong preference
| over "pointer container".
| The library combines serveral aspects, but the "pointer" is actualy
| the only unifying entity in all of them.
Allriiighty then, we have a winner :-)
Thanks for your input.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk