|
Boost : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-18 12:08:27
> Why can I not construct a regex of the form: "|abc" (throws exception
> based on REG_EMPTY) for use with regex_match, if I want to match either
> "abc" or the empty string "". I understand thatn in a regex_search the
> empty string would always match (per Perl like semantics), and abc would
> never be considered. But, I want to use this with regex_match, where the
> empty string would have to match the entire string being searched. Work
> arounds such as "(?:)|abc" and "^$|abc" seem to get around this
> deficiency, but I am wondering why it is there in the first place.
It's deliberate, based on the assumption that empty alternatives are almost
always a mistake (as an aside, although these are allowed in Perl 5, Perl 6
will make them an error as well). POSIX regular expressions also requires
them to be diagnosed as errors. As you say the workaround is to use (?:) as
a placeholder for the empty string (I do need to update the docs to make
this clear though).
John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk