From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-22 11:41:40
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> > I wil need to look in more detailes. I could be not trivial. Also I
> > couldn't
> >> > afford all the dependencies you introduced.
> >> ?? I was very careful to avoid dependencies.
> > #include <boost/optional.hpp>
> > #include <boost/function.hpp>
> Oh, sorry, I'm not using boost/function; the #include is detritus.
> Optional is used, but it's really neccessary in order to give this
> thing the right interface. I suppose it might be possible to
> duplicate the functionality, but that would be a real shame.
In fact optional could be acceptable. AFAIK it's portable enough and I am
considering using it myself. I still did not get a change to look in more
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk