Re: [boost] Type of Review for Unordered Associative Containers & Hash Functions

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-23 19:15:31

On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> The implementation has been split into two libraries. Boost.Hash 
> implements the hash function objects which would go into <functional>, 
> so it  is proposed that these are added to the functional library. 
> This is needed for Joaquín's MultiIndex library, so it would be good 
> to add it to Boost as soon as possible.

If it's small and MultiIndex needs it, it can go right in.

> We're not sure what kind of review these libraries will need. Since 
> they're both based on the draft standard, their design isn't really up 
> for review here (right?), but the documentation and implementation is. 
> Do you think they require a full review, or will a fast track review 
> be appropriate?

Boost.Unordered should be a fast-track review. We're only looking at 
code, tests, and docs: the interface is fixed or we're talking to the 
wrong crowd.

        Doug