From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-23 19:15:31
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> The implementation has been split into two libraries. Boost.Hash
> implements the hash function objects which would go into <functional>,
> so it is proposed that these are added to the functional library.
> This is needed for Joaquín's MultiIndex library, so it would be good
> to add it to Boost as soon as possible.
If it's small and MultiIndex needs it, it can go right in.
> We're not sure what kind of review these libraries will need. Since
> they're both based on the draft standard, their design isn't really up
> for review here (right?), but the documentation and implementation is.
> Do you think they require a full review, or will a fast track review
> be appropriate?
Boost.Unordered should be a fast-track review. We're only looking at
code, tests, and docs: the interface is fixed or we're talking to the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk