From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-24 06:54:06
"Justin Gottschlich" <jgottschlich_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
|> | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| At this point, I'm ready to step back and say, "ok, so ... let's figure out
| what we need to build." As I was discussing with Richard, I think we have
| two primary trees to develop:
| 1) trees as containers
| 2) trees as algorithms
| I think we need to figure out a design that is inherently inclusive to both
| groups (so everyone is happy). That being said, what do you think the best
| format to do that is?
| What do you think? And boy is this fun. =)
I'm not sure I like the expression "trees as algorithms". I would like to see
different types of iterators which can then be used to implement algorithms.
So I only see trees as containers.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk