From: Joao Abecasis (jpabecasis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-24 11:13:33
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Well that's distturbing, because it also means that the boost_1_32_0.zip
> has less files as that's what I used for building the exe. Have others
> noticed this?
I just uncompressed and diffed all archives available for download
(tar.gz, tar.bz2, zip and exe). I found *one extra* file in the zip archive:
I wouldn't worry about it too much ;)
Perhaps the OP got a corrupted or incomplete download.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk