[boost] Re: special_functions_test

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-25 13:44:40

> It would also help if you added the construct you wrote
>
> template<typename T>
> struct string_type_name;
>
> #define DEFINE_TYPE_NAME(Type)            \
> template<> struct string_type_name<Type>  \
> {                                \
>    static char const *  _()               \
>    {                             \
>       return #Type;                 \
>    }                             \
> }
>
>
> to a common header, as I believe I am not the only one who would benefit
> from it!

Usually I am using RTTI for this king of task. But I will think about it.
(MPL book have an excesize to do just something like this)

>       BTW, what now replaces unit_test_log ?

Nothing. Use unit_test_log. But without ::instance()

Gennadiy