From: Joao Abecasis (jpabecasis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-01 11:59:35
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> If I change the code now to use T's operator=(), assignment of optional<T&>
> will have a _radically_ different semantics. A correct one, that's for sure,
> but end user code might be fundamentally impacted.
Maybe boost::reference_wrapper can be used internally to wrap reference
types and solve this issue.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk