From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-02 17:49:25
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> This issue seems to have cooled down. Has there been
> some off-list progress, should we agree what to do here?
No, I've been taking a small break from it. There seem to be no real
objections to the original plan (fast-tracking Boost.Hash and placing
Boost.Unordered in the queue), so it looks like that's the way to go.
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> Well, I've got some comments on Unordered containers, waiting since las
> code snapshot was uploaded, I don't know if some of those comments are
> now outdated. I sent pre-review code comments do Daniel but with this
> snapshot I was waiting to the review process.
It has changed a fair bit since the last snapshot, which was taken at a
fairly arbitrary point. I wasn't planning on posting a new version until
the documentation and tests are looking complete.
> I don't know if the review process should wait the review queue, but I'm
> quite ready to make some comments.
Well, it'll probably be a while until the review (there are at least 4
reviews before it). If you have any problems with that version then I'll
try to fix them now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk