From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-03 19:30:59
Pavel Chikulaev wrote:
> Do you know that well-known Herb Sutter's assignment operator in most
> cases does unnecessary copying?
I don't know that it's "Herb's" assignment operator. He certainly
popularized the idiom with his book, but it may have existed before
> Matrix func ();
> Matrix a;
> Matrix = func();
> Result of func() is copied to temporary objectand then operator = copies it
> again. So assigning to result of function creates one useless object.
I would like to see compiler tests that show that neither RVO nor NRVO
work in these cases first.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk