Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-05 09:09:44

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [congif] BOOST_BEFRIEND_TEMPLATE, BOOST_PRIVATE"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [optional] new assignmet semantic and references"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Unhackable Wiki"
Reply: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Unhackable Wiki"

I don't see any reason our Wiki should be so vulnerable, and before we
make it official I would insist that we fix that. The Boost list
never gets spammed, and moderators don't even seem to have to reject
any spammers. All we need to do is use the same approval and posting
process for the Wiki. Is something wrong with that?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [congif] BOOST_BEFRIEND_TEMPLATE, BOOST_PRIVATE"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [optional] new assignmet semantic and references"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Unhackable Wiki"
Reply: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Unhackable Wiki"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk