From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-05 21:08:31
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
> In the case at hand, I believe "Interfaces Library" is a lousy name. If I were
> naming the library with no though to its possible future acceptance into boost,
> I might call it "C++ with Interfaces" (the name of Christopher's article). If it
> were eventually accepted into Boost, I'd change the name to Boost.Interfaces,
> but the de facto name, at least for a while, would be "Boost.Interfaces
> (formerly C++ with Interfaces)."
> To sum up, I prefer Dave's original suggestion, the
> "[proposed/contemplated/suggested] Boost Interfaces Library".
As far as I'm concerned, people can choose any one of the ways to
talk/type that makes it clear that it's not yet an official Boost
library. We don't have to all agree on a convention.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk